![spamassassin score range spamassassin score range](https://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/wp-content/qa/uploads/2020/10/6-ISnotSpam-300x214.png)
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.Ĭontent-Type: text/plain charset=iso-8859-1 NIGERIAN_BODY100,RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL shortcircuit=no autolearn=unavailableĬontent-Type: multipart/mixed boundary="-=_4A8CF48A.39B60000" X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=18.0 required=6.3 tests=ADVANCE_FEE_2,ADVANCE_FEE_3,ĪDVANCE_FEE_4,AWL,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MSOE_MID_WRONG_CASE, X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 () on Subject: *****SPAM***** ATT: DEAR Beneficiary. X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V.0000 Received: from User (unknown )īy (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C6684123BDB Received: from by mail-out02 (envelope-from, uid 106) with qmail-scanner-2.06 Ok, I used spamcc outfile to simulate the processing and opened both files in notepad (both files have crlf line endings, the multilined headers have tabs in front) Or maybe there's some other configuration made to SpamAssassin which makes hMailServer unable to parse the result. It's important that you open it in notepad, because many other editors automatically replaces \n with \r\n). If you open the result file from SA in notepad, you should be able to see if the headers are broken (many headers on the same line). If this is the case hMailServer will probably fail to parse the headers (because the headers are broken). Some versions of SpamAssassin has a bug where the header lines aren't generated properly (\n instead of \r\n).
#Spamassassin score range code
The tests include both spam messages and non-spam and confirms that they are handled properly, so it's unlikely that they are all broken (still very much possible though, since the tests are just more code which may contain bugs).Ĭould very well be that hMailServer doesn't parse the result properly for some reason. It could very well be that these 6-7 tests are broken or something like that, but I doubt it. Without beeing sure (I don't have access to my computer at the moment), there are automated tests which tests the spam-assassin integration every time a new build is created. 23:22:37 2009 info: spamd: result: Y 27 - DCC_CHECK,DIGEST_MULTIPLE,ONLINE_PHARMACY,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_RHS_DOB,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL scantime=5.5,size=807,user=(unknown),uid=0,required_score=6.3,rhost=,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=60812,mid=,autolearn=spam,shortcircuit=noĪny idea, why hMailServer claims score 0 when spamd recons score 27 ? 23:22:32 2009 info: spamd: processing message for (unknown):0 The spamassasin log file claims (lines shortened): 23:22:37.623" "Parsing response from SpamAssassin.
#Spamassassin score range windows
Windows Server 2008, spamd Version 3.2.3.5, hMailserver 5.2 356